Nowadays we are in an environment where is necessary that the companies know about the difference between governance management and operative tasks management for the better results of work.
The corporate governance management abilities the organization, identifies and select the investments that maximize the profit of business. Meanwhile the operative management possibilities to the company give with exit the business opportunities selected. The governance supposes the necessities, conditions and options to determine the goals will be reals, configurated for director’s trough priorization and making decisions and monitoring the job. For these reasons the governance management may: evaluating and determine the objectives of company to allow, direct, decide and follow the progress of projects and programs to principal objectives.
The task management planning, building, executing and monitoring the activities of low level that have to do for the consecution of the good execution of projects.
To understand better this distinction, it is necessarily seen that the governance management is responsibility of executives of task management of the teams. Involving the organization to the extreme at extreme, creating a unique environment job, allowing that the complete system works in a different way of that was joining the work of everyone on teams.
Without a distinction exists a risk in relation of responsibilities to different levels, existing tools that helps, integrating and complementing, that helps to allows a controlled management of projects since the start to the end, in addition stablishing a strategy in base of goals, defining and recompilation data that allows the development of business and monitoring the progress.
In a practice way, we could put of example Jira as a task tool. In the way of portfolio management tool, Talaia is a good example.
The management of governance is a model that allows to a better dialogue and model of negotiation. Stablish horizontal relations. Gruppe parts, process, models of decisions, tools, confinable communication and repeatable inside environment of project. Defining roles and prove the efficiency of Project Manager, gives his marge for take decisions.
The governability of projects that allows TALAIA involves process, tools, standards, responsibilities, etc. The team continues being responsive of planification, execution, control and closing. And how to say PMI, the governability of projects works in a supervision way alienating with the model of governance of company, including the all the cycle life of project.
Inside of governance management, the PMBOK methodology is that allows generate an environment of governability in a project, like the process to identify, scale and resolve inconvenient that could happen during the projects, the relations with teams or external groups. Facilities the process to the communication of information, making decisions of projects, giving guides to alienating the governability of projects with the organization. As too facilities the review of phases, approve changes on the bullet, the distance, the quality and the control of chronogram, adjusting to the interested with the requisites of projects.
For the tasks management, the Kanban methodology is an effective and agile model to the following of tasks projects. All the members of the team could visualize that they can do, they may do, they are doing or in that moment of task is the team now, etc. Visualizing the goals and pendent tasks or that been affected for something reason. Allowing make notifications, adjunct files, comments, charts and more.
The conclusion that we can extract of this comparative between operative tasks and governance tools resides on that the best part of a project is finding in the combination of the two tools that complementing one to other, giving the worst part of tasks and the governance, allowing the totality of the project process.
